Ninth Circuit clarifies the scope and application of “surcharge” and “reformation” remedies under ERISA

Print
Email
Reprints
 
By Darren E. Nadel
March 23, 2012

Skinner is a welcome decision for plan fiduciaries. It is, however, only the first appellate opinion on the subject post-Amara. Additionally, the facts of the case were not particularly compelling for the plaintiffs, since they received accurate information before making their retirement decisions and thus never relied on the faulty SPD. Undoubtedly other courts will tackle the issue of ERISA remedies in the coming months. In the meantime, however, employer/plan administrators should continue to subject their plan documents and benefits communications to a careful review to ensure their accuracy and clarity. Skinner teaches that, in the context of benefit communications, an ounce of prevention is truly worth a pound of cure.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Employee Benefit Adviser articles are archived after seven days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to exclusive industry white paper downloads, web seminars, podcasts and blog discussions. Members may also choose to receive any of our daily or weekly e-newsletters covering the latest breaking news, opinions from industry leaders and developing trends with specialized topics like defined contribution/defined benefit, healthcare insurance news, voluntary benefits, and legal issues.

Already Registered?

Get our daily e-newsletter, unlimited access to 2,500+ in-depth articles plus other exclusive benefits specifically for benefit brokers and advisers - Register Today


Related Articles

Most Popular

Most Forwarded