10 major concerns for health care reform after Supreme Court ruling
Even with the individual mandate in place, the success of many insurers under PPACA will depend on their ability to minimize adverse selection.
The courts decision to allow states to opt out of Medicaid expansion creates dynamic changes across the healthcare system.
While reports of the demise of employer-sponsored insurance coverage are premature, these plans still face many potential changes.
The role of the employer in covering those between 55 and 65 may change under PPACA.
Keeping rate increases under 10% may become more challenging with many of the traditional cost-control mechanisms no longer available to insurers.
With the Court decision minimizing uncertainty, there may be increased incentive for states to fast-track exchange planning.
Insurers have struggled to comply with the MLR requirements, and increased volatility in medical costs potentially brought on by adverse selection may compound the difficulty for insurers.
A new reform calculus is required with traditional risk selection techniques such as medical underwriting no longer allowed.
Subsidies, rating restrictions, and an effort to achieve universal coverage all introduce new cost dynamics for insurers, providers, and policyholders.
Certain aspects of PPACA have the potential to affect costs, but this potential needs to be actualized in order to moderate annual cost increases that regularly exceed other consumer spending.
Global consulting and actuarial firm Milliman identifies the major strategic considerations for plan sponsors, insurers, and advisers now that the Supreme Court has upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.