• Free Newsletters
  • Free Seminars and Podcasts from Industry Experts
  • Free Online Content and More

By The Numbers

Study of CDHP participants shows cost savings, greater engagement

Posted April 8, 2010 by Editorial Staff at 08:49AM. Comments (2)

Aetna members enrolled in a health savings account had more than 15% lower primary care physician use for non-routine visits, and more than 10 percent lower overall medical costs than members in a PPO plan, according to the insurer’s latest annual study of  its CDHPs.

The study of two million Aetna members shows sustained savings over time and increased member engagement in their health. The results also indicate that HSA members are more involved in their health care — they are two and a half times more likely to use online tools and three times more likely to take a health assessment than their PPO counterparts. Key findings include:

• For full-replacement HRA and HSA plans, employers saved $18 million per 10,000 members over five years.

• Employers that offer Aetna’s HRA and HSA plans experienced savings of $9 million per 10,000 members over five years for the total population, not just those people enrolled in an Aetna plan.

• Members spent more on preventive care and accessed higher levels of screenings for breast and cervical cancer compared with members in traditional PPO plans. In addition, diabetics are accessing screenings at higher rates than diabetics enrolled in traditional PPO plans.

• Members visited the emergency room less than their PPO counterparts.

• Members used generic drugs at higher rates than those in a PPO plan.

This year’s study also validates several best practices for employers to successfully implement a consumerism strategy and achieve better overall results, including:

• Fostering a culture where employees and senior executives are engaged health care consumers.

• Implementing a focused and ongoing employee education campaign.

• Offering wellness programs and incentives for healthy behavior.

• Providing 100-percent preventive care coverage.

• Carefully constructing a plan with the right mix of member responsibility.

• Steering employees to the CDHP choice by lowering the employee contribution or increasing the fund amount.

2 Comment(s)

Posted by: Di | April 14, 2010 4:49 PM

That's what you call taking strategic advantage of their work in gathering the data. They actually have the nerve to want to profit from their efforts. In other words, you may have to allow them to show you how they did it with the possibility gaining some business. Seems fair. They are just proving in a large study what hundreds of smaller studies have shown. There are Meta studies in print which go even beyond what Aetna is touting. Good luck.

Report this Comment


Posted by: Christopher M | April 14, 2010 3:39 PM

Is there an actual detailed study available somewhere that explains what went into the numbers? The link only points to a 2-page promotional piece.

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to By The Numbers, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immediately be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Welcome to By the Numbers

Welcome to By the Numbers, produced by Employee Benefit News and Employee Benefit Adviser. As an electronic extension of the popular, long-running feature in our print publication, By the Numbers provides a compilation of key data points around current conditions, and trends, in health care, retirement plans, work-life benefits and the high-growth area of voluntary benefits.

You will also find quick links to our brand's top stories, podcasts, events and more.Check back frequently for updates. We invite you to comment on the information provided or post new discussion ideas.

RSS US!

Advertisement